Jury finds Richard Williams liable but no damages to be paid
 |
Bill Jempty | Thursday, December 21, 2006 |
From the Palm Beach Post-
Although a jury found that Richard Williams did in fact breach a contract he signed promising his famous daughters, Venus and Serena Williams, would participate in a tennis match, they did not order him to pay the would-be promoters a dime.
Richard Williams was not in the courtroom when the jury returned with its decision. Venus and Serena Williams, however, were visibly elated, hugging each other and an older sister, Isha Williams, who came in from out of town for the final days of the multi-million dollar breach of contract trial.
The jury’s decision brings an end to the nearly five-week trial, punctuated by such acrimony and histrionics that several times, Palm Beach County Circuit Judge Jeffrey Winikoff has had to chastise the litigants and their attorneys.
Attorney F. Malcolm Cunningham Jr., who represented the Williams sisters, raised his hands over his head and yelled, “Yes! Yes! Yes!” in a small office inside the courthouse where he met privately with the family after the verdict.
At issue was a contract that Richard Williams signed promising his daughters would participate in a match that was to pit Venus and Serena Williams against two unnamed retired male tennis stars, possibly John McEnroe and Jimmy Connors.
The family had insisted the document was meaningless because Richard Williams had no authority to commit Venus and Serena Williams to anything, much less participate in a match that the promoters claimed would net $45 million.
However, attorneys representing shunned promoters Carol Clarke and Keith Rhodes, who say they stood to make as much as $9 million, produced several documents to dispute the family’s claims.
Throughout the trial, the Williams sisters insisted they sign their own contracts. But on Tuesday, spurned business adviser Leland Hardy took the stand armed with documents that punched holes in their claims that Richard Williams didn’t speak for them. Hardy offered four documents that Richard Williams apparently signed on his daughters’ behalf. He also offered a letter in which Richard Williams outlined the correct way to do business with the family.
The jury found the contract was indeed valid, but awarded no damages to Clarke and Rhodes.
Much ado about nothing in the end. My own take is the Williams are quite fortunate not to be paying these promoter damage. Despite their denials, the tax returns of the sisters listing their father as a manager seemed pretty damning.
See Previously- Tax filings say tennis stars paid Dad as their Manager
- Tax filings say tennis stars paid Dad as their Manager
- Venus Williams wins her 5th Wimbledon title
- Venus Williams beats Maria Kirilenko to win Korean Open
- Serena Williams wins the Australian Open
- Helio Castroneves found not guilty of tax evasion
- Serena Williams could be further punished for U.S. Open outburst
- Serena Williams loses U.S. Open tennis match due to penalty
- Czech player says he was asked to lose tennis match
- Tennis authorities looking into WTA match
- Ricky Williams to play for Toronto Argonauts
- Whacked- Washington Capitals beat Florida 7-4
- Bo Bae Song wins the Mizuno Classic
- Carolina Hurricane Goalie Cam Ward taken to hospital with a cut in his leg
- Ex-Claimer wins Breeders Cup Dirt Mile
- Ship wreck- Navy beats Notre Dame 23-21
- NY Islander Defenseman Radek Martinek out for the year with a torn ACL
- Oh have the mighty fallen- Purdue beats Michigan 38-36
- Out of luck- Northwestern beats Iowa 17-10
- Minnesota Twins acquire SS J.J. Hardy from Milwaukee
- U of New Mexico soccer player Elizabeth Lambert suspended indefinitely
Comments are Closed
