From the Palm Beach Post-
Although a jury found that Richard Williams did in fact breach a contract he signed promising his famous daughters, Venus and Serena Williams, would participate in a tennis match, they did not order him to pay the would-be promoters a dime.
Richard Williams was not in the courtroom when the jury returned with its decision. Venus and Serena Williams, however, were visibly elated, hugging each other and an older sister, Isha Williams, who came in from out of town for the final days of the multi-million dollar breach of contract trial.
The jury’s decision brings an end to the nearly five-week trial, punctuated by such acrimony and histrionics that several times, Palm Beach County Circuit Judge Jeffrey Winikoff has had to chastise the litigants and their attorneys.
Attorney F. Malcolm Cunningham Jr., who represented the Williams sisters, raised his hands over his head and yelled, “Yes! Yes! Yes!” in a small office inside the courthouse where he met privately with the family after the verdict.
At issue was a contract that Richard Williams signed promising his daughters would participate in a match that was to pit Venus and Serena Williams against two unnamed retired male tennis stars, possibly John McEnroe and Jimmy Connors.
The family had insisted the document was meaningless because Richard Williams had no authority to commit Venus and Serena Williams to anything, much less participate in a match that the promoters claimed would net $45 million.
However, attorneys representing shunned promoters Carol Clarke and Keith Rhodes, who say they stood to make as much as $9 million, produced several documents to dispute the family’s claims.
Throughout the trial, the Williams sisters insisted they sign their own contracts. But on Tuesday, spurned business adviser Leland Hardy took the stand armed with documents that punched holes in their claims that Richard Williams didn’t speak for them. Hardy offered four documents that Richard Williams apparently signed on his daughters’ behalf. He also offered a letter in which Richard Williams outlined the correct way to do business with the family.
The jury found the contract was indeed valid, but awarded no damages to Clarke and Rhodes.
Much ado about nothing in the end. My own take is the Williams are quite fortunate not to be paying these promoter damage. Despite their denials, the tax returns of the sisters listing their father as a manager seemed pretty damning.
See Previously- Tax filings say tennis stars paid Dad as their Manager
- Tax filings say tennis stars paid Dad as their Manager
- Venus Williams wins her 5th Wimbledon title
- Venus Williams beats Maria Kirilenko to win Korean Open
- Serena Williams wins the Australian Open
- Helio Castroneves found not guilty of tax evasion
- Serena Williams could be further punished for U.S. Open outburst
- Venus Williams defeats Israel’s Shahar Peer at the Dubai Tennis Championships
- Serena Williams loses U.S. Open tennis match due to penalty
- Russian tennis player Ekaterina Bychkova banned for 30 days
- Czech player says he was asked to lose tennis match
- Eight is Enough- Edmonton beats Chicago 8-4
- Lydia Ko wins New South Wales Open
- The Comeback I- Pittsburgh Penguins beat NY Islanders 5-0
- Seattle Mariners Outfielder Greg Halman stabbed to death at age 24
- Hee Young Park wins CME Titleholders Championship
- Oklahoma State Women’s Basketball Coach Kurt Budke dead at 50
- Costly mistake- Blackhawks waive Rostislav Olesz
- Manager Tony La Russa announces retirement
- Puck Drop- Florida Panthers start the 2011-12 NHL season
- 13-time PGA Tour winner Dave Hill dead at 74
Comments are Closed